At 07:58 PM 2/14/2004 -0600, you wrote:
I am simply amazed at the inability of some people to do a bit of simple
research on their own. If you wait around for someone else to hand you
the answers you are missing out on a lot of knowledge and the ability to
enrich other people with what you have found out.
I just queried Google.com with <"Calcium Phosphorous Ratio"> and got 10
pages of hits!
Here is one on phosphorous that is pertinent.
http://www.brandywinechiropractic.com/minerals/phosphorous
That one came up "not found."
Here's what I found.
I had to do some digging here.
References to horses, monkeys, mice etc,,.lots of 'em.
I left 'em out.
Don't miss the bottom one. It's the most important, I think.
******
In good health the ratio of calcium to
phosphorus in the blood is 10:4. If there is a
glandular imbalance, especially in regard to the
parathyroid glands, then this ratio will be
maintained at a different level, causing long-
term health deterioration. In particular, a high
ratio of phosphorus to calcium sensitizes the
body and increases inflammatory tendencies.
http://www.mrbean.net.au/~wlast/calcium.html
Ideally, the dietary calcium-phosphorus ratio
should be about 1 or 2:1.
http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0227.htm
IMO, the best site below on this and other issues:
The ratio of calcium to phosphorus in our bones
is about 2.5:1; the best proportions of these
minerals in our diet for proper metabolism are
currently under question.
http://www.healthy.net/asp/templates/article.asp?PageType=article&ID=2019
Do you still think the proper ratio is "common" knowledge?
[snip]
How many of you use seach engines FIRST then ask?
Not me. I expect the person making the statement to have done
the research and provided the sources...or to do the work if
asked. I will do so.
Why make perhaps hundreds do the grunt work for a bald statement
I made, then they discover that it was just that - a statement without
sources...or contradictory sources...or just plain crap science?
See http://gideonz.tripod.com/articles/OpenMind.htm
BTW, I don't exclude myself in this. Call me on it.
One page found on Google had a table of "acceptable" calcium/phosphorus ratios.
Acceptable by whom?
Where were the studies?
There's one thing I'm almost sure of:
That damn near everything I thought I knew is wrong.
And I also know that I'm not alone in that.
Nothing personal.
stuff
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 16:28, Stuff wrote:
> And for 2000 years everyone, I mean everyone, believed earth was
> the center of the universe.
>
> Is real discovery about "common" knowledge?
>
> Where's the data?
>
> We're all on the fringe here. The fringe of discovery.
>
> BTW, I'm not immune to spouting common knowledge either.
>
> The phosphorus/calcium ratio would be a nice place to start.
>
> Where did you find this ratio?
>
> stuff
>
> At 04:49 AM 2/14/2004 -0600, you wrote:
> >Which ones specifically please? Some of what I said is "common"
> >knowledge.
> >
> >Garnet
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
