--- Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intentionally don't want to exactly define what S is as it describes > vaguely-defined 'subjective experience generator'. I instead leave it > at description level.
If you can't define what subjective experience is, then how do you know it exists? If it does exist, then is it a property of the computation, or does it depend on the physical implementation of the computer? How do you test for it? Do you claim that the human brain cannot be emulated by a Turing machine? -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=40020966-19730d
