The link below is the reason for the blocked packages: http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/ad00280438a6
3 packages in the commit are build depend for icedtea6-jdk. You change the depend to java-jre which is a wanted of icetea6-jdk. jdk which you removed is provided by gcc+gcj. So it was a package just not want your looking for. I also fixed here below: http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/3a51d8de6d09 So you cause the block list then panicked on your own to write some new build cooking tool that has crappy depends tracking to a point that you will be back to where you started 1 year ago. Way to go. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Christophe Lincoln <[email protected]>wrote: > > > As I told, as first I'm angry because instead of explaining what > > you're doing & why you did it again with theses tazwok doesn't works, > > it's all buggy, etc… while THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! > > So I must'n have been clear: Tazwok IS incedible and works, I use it > these last month. But Tazwok dont feet most developer packing needs and > is a lot of work to maintain on Tank. > > > So. Few weeks ago you didn't intend to revert tazwok or to cook > > something else… Now you coded something like 1500 lines so I don't > > think the idea comes to you this night. Too bad if you havn't time to > > talk with me about it. > > You shoul reconsider that, I started cookutils 4 days ago when I gor > crazy to see all thes blocked package on Tank and when I tried to > rebuild the toolchain 3 times without succes (ok due to missing update > you will say, but why installed packages in chroot dont update them > self when cooked, I mean if pkg is installed then tazpkg install.) > > That said it also show Tazwok still need some work to be stable for > Tank and SliTaz Paclages. > > > Few hours ago you said that you «want to use current receipt». Now you > > are talking about making different compiles rules for tazwok in some > > packages, and to «fix» current receipts wich don't build using you're > > new cook tool. > > It was an idea, I'm open to discussion about compatibility. Look you > also did so many things in the wok that I can't checked eerything, but > let me say you I was afraid when I looker to Binutils or linux receipt > since ther have function I never know about... > > > So, what I understand is that you're not going to replace tazwok by > > cookutil only on tank but everywhere, and SliTaz lead is make this > > cookutil works even if it brokes tazwok. Then, I'm allowed (and people > > wanted to) to works on maintaining my(our) code & add a compatibility > > layer in receipts. Obviously, people who don't care about tazwok will > > eventually broke it, often or not. Given I don't have so much time & > > internet connection theses days, and maybe until automn, there's a > > probability that when I get a new opportunity to works on code > > seriously all will be hardly broken and 6 monthes of hard works will > > be trashed out. There's also good chances that in that time you take > > the decision to trash out all tazwok compatibility because it's > > bloated too. > > What a bunch of prevision. Medium ? > > > So, why I am angry? Let's say that if I knew it, I didn't spend my > > time on SliTaz & now I regret it because I feel that here you're only > > write few sweet words to avoid drama, & then you'll trash out the > > whole thing anyway. > > You know me so well ? I'm not trashing anything, I'm not replacing > Tazwok on Tank now and may not do it if one make it work, I asked you > some time ago to install the build bot, done ? These 160 blocked > packages was ther for more than a week, who care ? I asked you to > install the bb because I'm not sure wher and how to place it, it also > look like Christopher dont relay know, so YOU are the ONLY one who can > handle that. > > Did I touch Tazwok ? do you see commit that break receipt ? No and it's > not planed to remove it, but I'm sure you knaow that if anybody > maintain Tazwok it will be forgot, so why YOU must make this project > live, YOU take the maintainance, so it's your job. > > And you want to talk about time you give. Some one forced you to work > for slitaz ? Is'n it a pleasure or you ? You not pround of your work ? > So why have you done all that ? > > You must do things because you want it, because you belive in it. I > belive in SliTaz and I'm happy with it, it not just about code, it's a > human project and we have conflict, is's normal. > > I could also feel made because you wasted my time by commiting and > coding things only you want but was never a community discussion. > Resulting in no stable version in march like palnned one year before, > so I wasted 3 mount this year just because huge change appends in last > minute. Remember a sent a mail on the list end of last year saying wok > is frozen, no one listen to me, at least you and godane. > > You want to talk about regrets: I should have stop you in janury whwn > you broke Tank 10 times in 2 weeks, you would also have benefit of that > descision, since you would have not lost your time. > > > Too bad... > > Yes too bad... > > > GoKhlaYeh <[email protected]> > > - Christophe > > --- > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >
