I also noticed that we should have a packages-incoming and packages repos. Only cause it looks like packages folder is not a repo. Just packages. It needs to act like a repos or you will not build with lastest packages you just build. This is good for bigger builds.
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Rogers <[email protected]>wrote: > We can add but not sure we want to keep 'tazwok get-src' in receipt... >> What not use the standard WGET_URL and TARBALL ? >> > > I think we did so we could have custom target folder with a simple command. > Linux for exampile: > tazwok get-src aufs --target=$AUFSDIR > > This way the source was extracted in to a target folder then the default > $WOK/aufs/aufs-VERSION. By default in tazwok it use to extract with get-src. > I had to get --nounpack option add so i could just download without filling > the wok. > > I know we are not going to have the tazwok get-src but a cook get-src aufs > /path/to/folder would be nice. It will keep things clean and simple with > receipts like linux. > > > > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Christophe Lincoln <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> > New extract_source function. I hope this helps. >> >> Yes it helps! Commited: >> http://hg.slitaz.org/cookutils/rev/49f9b134c2a9 >> >> > *Z|*taz) uncompress -c $SRC/$TARBALL | tar xf - ;; >> >> What is this taz ? >> >> - Christophe >> >> --- >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >> >> >
