|
JH Thank you for replying about the lightning What Ethernet protection are you talking about They make protection that protects the transmit and receive pairs Panamax makes a surge protector for all 4 pair and these clamp at 19v,
MAX Lan/Gigabit Is this what you are talking about or you talking about something on the
tower at the radios? Thanks again Joe Kelley East Texas DSL -----Original
Message----- The
Polyphasers did what they were supposed to do....they protected your
radios. Almost any lightning protection is going to fail with a direct
strike, but with luck the electronics behind may fail. If the
SmartBridges are up on the tower, put a cat5 supressor between it and the
radios so another hit does not come up the tower and eat the ethernet port. JH -----
Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003
7:05 PM Subject:
[smartBridges] Question about Lightning Protection Board We are operating off two
towers We were using Oronoco
AP1000 w/3-120 degee sectors on each tower We had a terrible lightning
storm moved through Monday afternoon Our AP’s on the 300’ tower
took a hit We were protecting the
radios with PolyPhasers The lightning took the
polyphasers out The radios are ok This is good, but we still
had to go up 300’ on the tower The Trango 5.8 backhaul is
located 10’ above the 2.4 antennas, they are ok When we went up there we
replaced the Orinoco radios with smartBridges APPO’s We did install shielded
cable however My question is this, is
there protection you can put on the AP’s, that if they take a close lightning
hit That will protect the radio
but will reset after the lightning hit I haven’t seen any
recommendations on any lightning protection from smartBridges, but I could have
overlooked it Thanks Joe East Texas DSL -----Original Message----- We value your suggestion and feedback, it really makes us to
improve our product better in functionality and performance. Recently released
software and firmware were fixes the many of the issues were reported by our
value added customers. We are looking for your continuous support and suggestion which
will help us to serve you better in future. Thanks Seeni, SB support -----Original Message----- Can I see the suggestion box so far and its status :D hehe Just
Kiddin just keep us posted on the future firmwares that freezing bugs driving
my clients mad ( I lost 1 today L ) Chris From:
Seeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris, I will check with our development team about how could be achieved
with these features on the CPE devices. I added your comments into the
suggestion box. Seeni, SB support -----Original Message----- Seeni could it be implemented and tested to see how the effect on
performance is done (as an optional component I mean if like myself we have
solid links and want PPPoE and don't mind a hit of 10% I would turn it on) as
for VLAN's I actually mean mac based vlans so that the client can be tagged at
the ap for a certain ap (business, home, etc) so that they can get
automatically divided up at the noc. I love when you respond so quick, Seeni do you have msn? J Chris From:
Seeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Our current airpoint series does support the VLAN tagging by
allowing "Non-IP traffic" option in the advanced TAB. To support with
multiple SSID, our next release version will come this features. Our Speedtrap
is under development process. It is a good feature to authenticate thru airbridge but it is a
simple layer 2 device which may reduce the performance. Seeni, Sb support -----Original Message----- Sounds great!
Seeni I have 2 questions A. For the AP's is there any possibility of VLAN's
being implemented either on the current AP's or in the simpletraps this is
something really has over the rest and I think would be a great added feature. B. On the
Airbridges to implement PPPoE, NO I did NOT say support I said PPPoE, as in the
ability to enter the clients username and password in simplemonitor and it will
authenticate the user. THIS WOULD BE A KICK A** Feature and would definitely be
worth it. Whats the practicality and probability of this? This would in
my vision make both products worth their weight in gold and both would really
meet that "carrier grade" product specifications like it says on the
website. Also whats
the schedule on the firmware to bring the Airpoint up to grade with the pro's
and also are we going to get an acknowledgement of the freezing problem from
the atmel chip and a fix for it in the new version PLEASE. Chris -----Original
Message----- At the
moment, we do not have Qos features on the sB devices. In future Seeni,
SB support -----Original
Message----- I am using a
Cisco AP350 as my AP and using the SBTotal (and some QoS Basis
Service Set (QBSS)-Based on IEEE 802.11e DRAFT version 3.3 The issue is,
if I have the AP350 broadcast this info, will the SB's use it? or
should I just turn that off to conserve on overhead? Thanks The
PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List The
PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List |
Title: RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals
- Practicality of PPPoE client on aB (Was: Re: [... Lars Gaarden
- RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals phantam
- RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals shoffman
- RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals phantam
- RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals phantam
- RE: [smartBridges] QoS on SBTotals smartBridges Tech Team
- [smartBridges] Question about Lightning Pr... Joe Kelley
- Re: [smartBridges] Question about Ligh... John Hokenson
- [smartBridges] Urgent DHCP Problem... Joe Kelley
- [smartBridges] Urgent DHCP Pr... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Tom Haynes
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Tom Haynes
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Boris Tillett
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Boris Tillett
- RE: [smartBridges] Urgent... Alex Wong
