I'd offer two options a 2.4 and a 5.8. Give the pro's and con's of each and using your expert knowledge of the local topography and spectrum, give them your recommendation.
Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Flood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:32 PM Subject: Re[2]: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the newfirmware? > Chris! > > You can spend approximately 3 time the cash with no real guarantee that is > will be much different. I really don't believe that SB is "testing" > anything on us. It's simply called "growing pains". I still believe this > product for the price point is superior to the rest in it's class. > > You are proposing to a large company that is good, however you need to > understand that deployment of this equipment is not "cookie > cutter" Everyone here will attest that putting this gear in the air is > difficult. Terrain, trees, city zoning and many, many more issues will > need to be considered when cutting a big deal. > > I'd stick with the SB line. They'll pull things together before the deal > goes down. > > Good Luck, > > At 02:10 AM 7/20/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Ok, here's a jam now... > > > >I need to have a proposal ready for VP of a 786 employee ISP by > >Monday, and I can't screw this up! What equipment do you recommend? > > > >Looks like SB aren't a choice unless they get their problems fixed and > >stop testing them on consumers > > > >Sunday, July 20, 2003, 1:37:56 AM, you wrote: > > > >JH> Return-Path: <> > >JH> Received: from [66.150.163.162] (HELO m5) > >JH> by spamarrest.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) > >JH> with ESMTP id 10280714 for cbunting; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 23:05:08 -0700 > >JH> Received: from part-15.org ([198.63.203.3]) > >JH> by mail.fission2.com (Merak 5.9.4) with SMTP id CPA74271 > >JH> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:39:37 -0400 > >JH> Received: from natasha.vircom.net [207.1.180.3] by pdqlink.com with ESMTP > >JH> (SMTPD32-4.07) id AC902EC0122; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 00:45:52 CDT > >JH> Received: from rocky ([192.168.250.22]) > >JH> by natasha.vircom.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h6K5bwj09347 > >JH> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 22:37:58 -0700 > >JH> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> From: "John Hokenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> References: > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 22:37:56 -0700 > >JH> MIME-Version: 1.0 > >JH> Content-Type: text/plain; > >JH> charset="iso-8859-1" > >JH> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >JH> X-Priority: 3 > >JH> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >JH> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > >JH> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > >JH> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > >JH> Precedence: bulk > >JH> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >JH> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >JH> My rep at Tessco is making noises about dropping them. > > > >JH> JH > >JH> ----- Original Message ----- > >JH> From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >JH> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:10 PM > >JH> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > > > > > >> My concern is that with all we've invested in these products (and I really > > >> like them) distributors might start to drop them. Think about it, if you > > >> were Ecomm would you want all this hassle? > > >> > > >> I would rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments until > >JH> they > > >> get this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product that works > >JH> so > > >> I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta products that > > >> simply aren't yet ready. > > >> > > >> I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again working. > > >> > > >> Ray > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > >> > > >> > > >> > I would agree with that! > > >> > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them from? I get mine from > > >> ECOMM > > >> > and they have been pretty good for the most part. I dont like the idea > >JH> of > > >> > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the repalcement ahead of > > >> time > > >> > then refund you when they get the non working one back??? Seems > >JH> backwards > > >> to me > > >> > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in advance exchange liek > > >> their > > >> > warranty clearly states without being charged 1st then charge me if I > >JH> dont > > >> send > > >> > it back within 10 days. This was after I ordered two new APPO's and one > >JH> I > > >> > recieved was a used unit sent back for repair! > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Quoting Eje Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > > > >> > > shrug.. Now I am going to shock this entirely list by finally agreeing > > >> > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with what you just said. > > >> > > > > >> > > If they all where bad out of the box or a lot of them where bad out of > > >> > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem not the manufacturers > > >> > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you you might > > >> > > try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued it should > > >> > > be the dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not give you a > > >> > > refund. They sold the unit for say $10 and you purchased it for $20 > > >> > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund for $20 and > > >> > > lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you a refund > > >> > > it's the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then the > > >> > > manufacturer can give you a working replacement. > > >> > > > > >> > > Best regards, > > >> > > Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com > > >> > > Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 > > >> > > - Your Full Time Professionals - > > >> > > eBay UserID : macahan > > >> > > --- > > >> > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. > > >> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ > > >> > > -- > > >> > > p> Ok T n T > > >> > > > > >> > > p> WOW Talk about a drastic calling for attention in my view, most of > > >> the > > >> > > p> people on the board are working on resolving problems and your > > >> response > > >> > > toa > > >> > > p> firmware issue is that they are advertised as carrier class and > >JH> that > > >> > > they > > >> > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco or lucent? If so I'd > >JH> gladly > > >> like > > >> > > to > > >> > > p> get my money back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet Converters and a > > >> few > > >> > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet to hear anyone > > >> that > > >> > > is > > >> > > p> pissed at the fact that they only exchange units in a timely manner > > >> and > > >> > > wont > > >> > > p> give them there cash back? Personally I don't recall many groups > >JH> that > > >> > > will > > >> > > p> do cash refunds from the primary company isn't this a point to deal > > >> with > > >> > > p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause you don't > > >> want > > >> > > p> them. > > >> > > > > >> > > p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind there problems > > >> > > p> including phone calls from half way across the world at 10am to > >JH> help > > >> > > solve > > >> > > p> MANY users problems in a one on one basis, they take suggestions > >JH> and > > >> work > > >> > > to > > >> > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested 6,000$ wow I have > > >> > > spent > > >> > > p> over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it and i have > >JH> yet > > >> to > > >> > > p> find a reason to neglect the funds spent. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS > > >> > > > > >> > > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and the return > > >> box > > >> > > must > > >> > > p> include all components and originally packaged with the product, > > >> > > including > > >> > > p> cable, software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA number before > > >> you > > >> > > p> return any defective or DOA products. > > >> > > > > >> > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA MEANS DEAD ON ARRIVAL > >JH> HENCE > > >> > > YOU > > >> > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT SINCE IT WAS DEAD > > >> AS > > >> > > SOON > > >> > > p> AS YOU GOT IT. > > >> > > > > >> > > p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE PRINT it > >JH> is > > >> > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text under the warranty > >JH> conditions. > > >> > > Not > > >> > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from you. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on your comment. > > >> > > > > >> > > p> Chris > > >> > > p> -----Original Message----- > > >> > > p> From: Tom & Toni Maris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:44 PM > > >> > > p> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > > >> > > p> My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than > >JH> $6,000.00 > > >> in > > >> > > this > > >> > > > > >> > > p> gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. > > >> > > p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we read the > > >> fine > > >> > > print > > >> > > > > >> > > p> on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just > >JH> replacement > > >> > > units > > >> > > p> and that you have to have the original box! > > >> > > p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier class. > > >> > > p> This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an honest > > >> > > company. > > >> > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying anything about > > >> > > Carrier > > >> > > p> class. > > >> > > p> Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, why do you > > >> need > > >> > > an > > >> > > p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do refunds? > > >> > > > > >> > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this Smartbridge > > >> company > > >> > > p> stand behind their products or give everyone their money back. He > > >> thinks > > >> > > > > >> > > p> that their is probably enough people like us who got ripped off to > > >> get a > > >> > > > > >> > > p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this pile of > > >> junk > > >> > > > > >> > > p> Very very disapointed > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > p> T n T > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > >> firmware? > > >> > > >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the problem here We > > >> hav > > >> > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 miles the last > > >> > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS I had > > >> sugested > > >> > > >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to get on > >JH> this > > >> > > list > > >> > > >>and post only to see what I have been telling support since last > >JH> week > > >> > > >>before > > >> > > >>the release only to be told its been working well in the "LAB" > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be tested in > >JH> a > > >> > > >>consistant manor not just really close up. > > >> > > >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if possible > > >> > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is working and > >JH> how > > >> > > well > > >> > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get association but > > >> speeds > > >> > > >>are > > >> > > >>WAY down. > > >> > > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of testing before > > >> ANY > > >> > > >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of those of us in > > >> the > > >> > > >>field! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have been tested > > >> in > > >> > > the > > >> > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something that is a > > >> > > secret?? > > >> > > >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are working > > >> rock > > >> > > >>solid and have ALL my customers down. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I have seen > > >> > > >>problems > > >> > > >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware is > > >> compatible > > >> > > >>with > > >> > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on the only > > >> radio > > >> > > > > >> > > >>we > > >> > > >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now doorstops > > >> > > after > > >> > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the final > > >> release. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we found the same > > >> > > thing > > >> > > >>on rev 2 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware is not > > >> > > >>compatible > > >> > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say. > > >> > > >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less then a month > > >> ago so > > >> > > > > >> > > >>I > > >> > > >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come up with a > > >> way > > >> > > to > > >> > > >>positively identify which units are suspect with the suspect chip. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that you can > >JH> afford > > >> to > > >> > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what happens is the > > >> > > radio > > >> > > >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to log into > >JH> the > > >> > > >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you no longer > > >> get a > > >> > > >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and don't see > > >> how > > >> > > >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the IP address > > >> etc > > >> > > but > > >> > > >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to unlock it > >JH> but > > >> > > that > > >> > > >>was useless because you need a network connection to the radio > >JH> hahaha. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you can see in > > >> our > > >> > > >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it works well in > > >> the > > >> > > >>lab > > >> > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know how far > >JH> away > > >> > > they > > >> > > >>tested the radio. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 miles we > > >> > > associate > > >> > > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine and at same > > >> 3.5 > > >> > > >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with rev > >JH> 0.01.04 > > >> we > > >> > > >>get > > >> > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. > > >> > > >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with firmware > >JH> 0.01.04 > > >> > > get > > >> > > >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final revision and > > >> we > > >> > > >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower but we can > > >> ping > > >> > > >>ABO > > >> > > >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with both > > >> firmware. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I don't > > >> understand > > >> > > >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing issue? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on old radios > > >> with > > >> > > >>old > > >> > > >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load the > > >> 0.01.06 > > >> > > on > > >> > > >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling which radios > > >> have > > >> > > >>new or old atmel chip? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs > > >> > > >>out to 7.2 miles. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > >> > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM > > >> > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > >> firmware? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Nish, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this morning > >JH> and > > >> it > > >> > > >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no plans to > > >> > > update > > >> > > >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is there going > >JH> to > > >> be > > >> > > >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Chris > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>--- > > >> > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net > > >> > > >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. > > >> > > >>P.O. Box 55 > > >> > > >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 > > >> > > >>970-218-5295 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >> > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park > > >> > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM > > >> > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > >> firmware? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Tim, > > >> > > >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still doing the same > > >> > > >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July purchase?), > >JH> RSSI > > >> > > and > > >> > > >>LQ values, Brand of AP? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association at > >JH> elevated > > >> > > >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of all our > > >> efforts > > >> > > and > > >> > > >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we will be > > >> > > focusing > > >> > > >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are trying to > > >> see > > >> > > >> >if > > >> > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of "periodic > >JH> lockup". > > >> I > > >> > > >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that has not > > >> been > > >> > > >>the > > >> > > >>focus of the current activity on hand. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Thanks for your support. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Nish > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >> > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris > > >> > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM > > >> > > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > >> > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > >> firmware? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. Had to > >JH> unplug > > >> it > > >> > > to > > >> > > >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. Started > > >> > > working > > >> > > >>fine. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, still > >JH> doing > > >> the > > >> > > >>same thing! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a point. > >JH> This > > >> > > seems > > >> > > >>to be getting ridiculous. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response then.. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Tim Harris, Operations > > >> > > >>www.dwisp.net > > >> > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > >> > > >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM > > >> > > >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready to try, > > >> but > > >> > > >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others have had. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Thanks > > >> > > >> > Sam > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > >> unsubscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges) > > >> > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >JH> (in > > >> > > the > > >> > > >>body type unsubscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges) > > >> > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >JH> (in > > >> > > the > > >> > > >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > > >> > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges) > > >> > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > >> > > >>smartBridges) > > >> > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > > > >> > > p> _________________________________________________________________ > > >> > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > > >> > > p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > >> > > > > >> > > p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> > > p> smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> > > p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > >JH> unsubscribe > > >> > > p> smartBridges) > > >> > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > >> > > > > >> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> smartBridges > > >> > > <yournickname> > > >> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > >> > > smartBridges) > > >> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Martin Moreno > > >> > Blazen Wireless > > >> > 909-907-4106 > > >> > www.blazenwireless.com > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > >> smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > >> smartBridges) > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> --- > > >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > >> Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 > > >> > > >> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > >JH> smartBridges <yournickname> > > >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > >JH> smartBridges) > > >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >JH> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > >JH> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > >smartBridges <yournickname> > >JH> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > >smartBridges) > >JH> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > >-- > >Best regards, > >Chris Bunting, MCSE > >President > >Cellular: 717-278-6639 > >Nextel ID: 196*50*18726 > >-------------------------------------------------------- > >Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer > >A+ Hardware Certification > >3com NBX Certified Technician > >-------------------------------------------------------- > >Lancaster Networks > >1085 Manheim Pike > >Lancaster PA 17601 > >717-735-2279 > >www.lancasternetworks.com > >-------------------------------------------------------- > > > >NOTICE: This Email message and all attachments transmitted with it may > >contain proprietary information intended solely for > >the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the > >intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > >reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this > >message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If > >you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > >immediately by electronic mail at > >[EMAIL PROTECTED], and delete this message and all copies and backups > >thereof. Thank you. > > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > >smartBridges <yournickname> > >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > >smartBridges) > >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > Bill Flood > AirRunner Networks LLC --- We make the web fast! > If you get tired of the wait call 715-443-3700! > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 7/18/2003 The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
