Okay that makes sense and finally answers if it is compatible with he old chip. It is pretty obvious that it is having some sort of side affect. On the units you have there that you are testing are you associating to APPO's or something else? if in fact they are APPO's what firmware is on the appo's production or some form of test firmware?
Thanks Quoting Nish Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is not a chip level problem but timing issue that gets exposed only > at higher temp. The F/W is just adding an extra wait state while the > code is being copied to RAM. So from conceptual level it is quite > straight forward. It is a benign change and will work with new chip, old > chip etc etc. > > We just need to make sure that it is not having some side effects. > > > Nish > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Garrett > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 3:49 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > Yes that was company provided info. The story was it was a change in the > Atmel chip that was not > told to them. > They are attempting to fix a chip level problem with firmware. > I am sure they check every chip now to be sure it is the correct one. > How many problem units are still out there is a good question but with > my luck I will get them. > Your Mileage may vary. > > Martin Moreno wrote: > > > I would not say new units shipping are okay was this info that was > release by > > SB that in fact the new units shipping are okay and if so would there > not be > > new firmware that works?? then if that were the case then they would > pass the > > firmware to us which I don't think has happened because I think your > incorrect > > in saying the new units are working good??? > > > > I could be wrong SB any comments?? > > > > Thanks > > > > Quoting Gary Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > If I understand this correctly, The problem has been fixed. The new > units are > > > shipping and working OK. > > > The problem here is some of us have deployed bad units from 1-2 > months ago > > > that are giving us fits. > > > We reserve the right to piss and moan, but SB never would have got > to where > > > they are if the stuff was just plain junk. > > > I would propose two options, low cost with SB and plan B with > another vendor > > > and higher cost and let them decide. > > > Anyone care to comment about reliability in the last week shipments? > We got > > > two bad units 2 weeks ago from EC. > > > > > > BTW, look at this graph now. RF is showing up again after the sun > went down. > > > Sure looks like heat to me. > > > Rick, ramp up to build those shields, you could be the next Bill > Gates. > > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges > <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > Martin Moreno Blazen Wireless 909-907-4106 www.blazenwireless.com The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
