I think that after 9/11 a Clinton
Administration would have gone through some motions. I don't believe they
would have prosecuted a war on Iraq. Probably would have done the action
in Afghanistan, because the American people would have nothing less. After
a bit of fighting in Afghanistan a Clinton administration would have begun to
disengage, and certainly wouldn't consider a "war" on terror, but would opt for
using police type tactics instead of military options.
As
I recall, even in election cycles, the republicans stood behind Clinton when he
threatened to get tough on Iraq. They only bucked when he wanted to make
token gestures.
Charles Mims
It is a mistake to look too far ahead. Only one link in the chain of destiny can be handled at a time. - Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:03 AM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: [Sndbox] Weapons of mass (Hypothetical)
I really don't see Clinton's quotes as haunting *him*... they haunt the Democratic Party.
What if this was the end of *Clinton's* first term and he had handled all of the events
after 9/11 exactly as Bush has. Yes exactly... What would the Republican candidates
be saying in there election speeches about Clinton's foreign policies?
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
