Vindicated?
My position... Is just my opinion... I could be wrong...
I don't think Clinton would have liked the UN bossing him around anymore
than Bush did.
I think that 9/11 was something that the GOP remembers and the Dems
have forgot *for convenience* while they try to over throw the evil Bush.
I do agree that France and Russia may have still said NO... that doesn't
change much though.
You are still not with the spirit of the question.
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 05:48 PM, Charles wrote:
It was all about Bill....and he could be swayed by polls, but I don't think he would have gone into Iraq. I think he would have "talked tough", but when the UN said no he'd have felt vindicated. The UN wasn't going to say yes because France and Russia were guilty of breaking the resolutions themselves.<image.tiff>
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
I want to die peacefully, in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming, terrified, like his passengers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim HarderTim Harder
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:27 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Weapons of mass (Hypothetical)
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 02:55 PM,
Tim: I think Clinton would have relished the opportunity to be the "commander in chief" in a time of war. It was all about Bill.
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
