|
thank you. Exactly what I have been telling
Tim all day.
:D
~*~*Bethany*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 3:45
PM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Weapons of mass
(Hypothetical)
I think that after 9/11 a Clinton
Administration would have gone through some motions. I don't believe
they would have prosecuted a war on Iraq. Probably would have done the
action in Afghanistan, because the American people would have nothing
less. After a bit of fighting in Afghanistan a Clinton administration
would have begun to disengage, and certainly wouldn't consider a "war" on
terror, but would opt for using police type tactics instead of military
options.
As I recall, even in election cycles, the republicans stood
behind Clinton when he threatened to get tough on Iraq. They only bucked
when he wanted to make token gestures.
Charles
Mims
It is a mistake to look too far ahead. Only
one link in the chain of destiny can be handled at a time. - Sir Winston
Leonard Spencer Churchill
I really don't see Clinton's quotes as haunting
*him*... they haunt the Democratic Party.
What if this was the end of
*Clinton's* first term and he had handled all of the events
after 9/11
exactly as Bush has. Yes exactly... What would the Republican candidates
be
saying in there election speeches about Clinton's foreign policies?
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing
list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
