At 07:01 PM 3/6/2002, Jeff Naber wrote:
>Jim, you are obviously a multiple model owner.

Not uncommon.  Everyone one of my flying buddies is too.


>I know, I have seen you
>at many contests. Why are you not willing to use your skill with one
>plane design.

I thought I was being very clear here, I will try again, I never said I 
wasn't willing to fly a one plane contest.  I said I didn't like the way 
the current rule is written/enforced, and how a minority of pilots use that 
rule to change models.  Why should I suffer or look the other way at pilots 
for a poorly written/enforced rule?  If it can't be enforced because of 
some obvious logistical problems, why not just give everyone the option 
instead of letting a few get away with it?



>You can have any one plane you want. I have multiple
>models myself, but by allowing the use of multiple models you are
>imposing extra cost on most of the competitors that they may not be able
>to incur.

Your right, I do, multiple models of the same type mostly.

And I disagree that imposes extra cost because everyone that contests 
already has multiple models.  This point is already made, you have your 
opinion, I have mine.

BTW, I took just one model to the recent SWC contest in Phoenix. I could 
have taken a half dozen but I only needed one.

Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537    LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780    R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to