On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:43 -0500, Robert Derman wrote:
> Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > Ian Lynch wrote:
> >>> this is agreed to be unsatisfactory,
> >>
> >> Yes it would be difficult to see how the measurement might be checked
> >> without losing the odd atom or two :-)
> >
> > Wikpedia says that the lump of metal gains mass because it absorbs 
> > atmospheric contamination. So they have this complicated technique to 
> > clean it, and the technique removes about 5-60 micrograms of 
> > contaminants. I imagine that you have to worry about not removing too 
> > much stuff every time you clean it.
> >
> > They actually have several replicas around the world, for mutual 
> > calibration. But it turns out that these masses have been diverging 
> > from each other. The base prototype (the one that truly defines the 
> > Kg) has lost about 50 micrograms in its life compared to the replicas. 
> > Nobody knows why. So they also don't know whether the main prototype 
> > has lost mass or whether the replicas have gained mass (maybe they 
> > replicas don't get cleaned as well?). And of course, it's possible 
> > that they are all diverging one way or the other, and we wouldn't know.
> >
> > There is an additional 30 microgram monthly variation in the 
> > proptotypes which is not explained either.
> >
> > Daniel.
> I have an odd theory, nothing to back it up really, but here goes -- 
> what if "dark matter" tends to drift in and out of normal matter, 
> doesn't interact, isn't detectable by any means except by its actual 
> mass.  I have not heard of any other theories that make any more sense 
> than this to explain this phenomenon.

Bit like neutrinos. ISTR that neutrinos have a mean free path of 144
light years in iron so they are pretty difficult to detect but they do
have a notional mass. I think the calcs showed that neutrinos couldn't
be responsible for dark matter. Probably something in wikipedia about it
if I could be bothered to look it up :-)

Ian
-- 
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to