No ICE huh......

I know! I know! Go to the grocery store. Buy a pack of lunch meat, the 
smelliest cheese you can find, and some monkey bread. Return to work and make 
your lunch from the ingredients. Whilst everyone is running away from the smell 
of the cheese, cheat and use ICE. 

I know, I broke the spirit of the challenge. Guilty as charged. But I bet Ed 
liked the solution.

:)

--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES)
Mymic Technical Services
NASA Langley Research Center
__________________________________________________
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.


-----Original Message-----
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Matt Lind
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:54 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Survey - how would you do this?

Softimage doesn't have a particle system anymore.  ICE replaced it.

To answer your question - yes.


Matt




-----Original Message-----
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph 
G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:48 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Survey - how would you do this?

Wouldn't restricting use of ICE mean you have no access to the out of the box 
particle tools?

--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES) Mymic Technical Services 
NASA Langley Research Center __________________________________________________
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not represent 
the opinions of NASA or any other party.


-----Original Message-----
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Eric Thivierge
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:46 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Survey - how would you do this?

With those restrictions, get a super fast animator to animate them by hand.

Eric T.

On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:23:31 PM, Matt Lind wrote:
> An artist came to my desk yesterday asking how to do what I felt was a 
> simple task, but after getting 80% through it I ran into a speed bump 
> realizing it needed custom scripting or other advanced tools to fully 
> resolve to satisfaction.  I had to give him a procedure that was ‘good 
> enough’.  This problem has multiple solutions, but I am curious how 
> others would solve it:
>
> The problem:
>
> Artist must create an asteroid belt around a planet.  The asteroids 
> are likely 2D sprites which must face the camera and tumble as they 
> orbit, but could be 3D objects as well.  Asteroids must vary in size, 
> shape, and animation speed (linear as well as rotational).  Asteroids 
> cannot collide with anything.  Movement is generally slow – like a 
> screen saver for your computer desktop.  Asteroid positions are 
> jittered within the belt.
>
> The question:
>
> Dispersing objects into a ring is fairly straightforward through a 
> number of techniques, but how do you apply the random jitter to the 
> object positions?
>
> The rules:
>
> -Cannot use ICE
>
> -Cannot use custom scripts, custom operators, or shaders.
>
> -Must only use tools out of the box that a junior or staff level 
> artist would know how to use.
>
> -Must be able to create the asteroid belt, from scratch to completion, 
> in less than 30 minutes – and be iteration friendly to react to art 
> director feedback.
>
> -Ideally, the belt could be made a child of the planet in encompasses 
> so it can be reoriented with respect to changes in the planet’s 
> size/shape/tilt/orbit.
>
> -Final output must be able to exist with full integrity on its own in 
> a vacuum.  Cannot not have dependencies on custom code, external 
> assets, or special case logic.
>
> -Asteroid belt fits within the default grid as seen in the scene 
> camera.  Think torus with diameter 40 SI units, and cross section of 
> roughly 3 SI Units diameter
>
> Ready…..GO!
>
> Matt
>




Reply via email to