And in doing so you demonstrated a recalcitrant resistance to change improvement and bettering of the package, for any reason. Further consernes where raised about the UI and you dismissed them. The reason Maya users put up with this shit, is not an incentive to do nothing. I'm sure a lot of Maya artists would welcome a clean up in the UI, think of initiatives like CADjunkie ZEN. http://cadjunkie.com/zen if anything it shows you care, and that you are comited to exploring and optimising user experience.
Thanks for sharing Jason S hadn't heard of that. I really hope they can pull it off. "unless bought or bribed." i wouldn't worry too much about that, the French are notoriously stubborn i can attest to this :P On 17 October 2014 03:46, Luc-Eric Rousseau <luceri...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, the question of this thread is specially about whether someone > would build a softimage-like supra/sticky toolstack for Maya, and I'm > the only one that actually answered with any information on the > subject. > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 10/16/14 9:59, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote: > > > >> So there is no way we're going to break the hotkeys/marking menus for > >> everyone else to jam in a softimage-like tool stack. > > > > Hum.. I hardly think the complaint is that it's not like Soft, as > opposed > > to it not (at-all) being as 'streamlined'. >
