On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Michael <solrco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If this were IO bound, wouldn't I see the same results when sending my 8 > > requests to 8 Tomcats? There's only one "disk" (well, RAM) whether I'm > > querying 8 processes or 8 threads in 1 process, right? > > Right - I was thinking IO bound at the Lucene Directory level - which > synchronized in the past and led to poor concurrency. Buy your Solr > version is recent enough to use the newer unsynchronized method by > default (on non-windows) > Ah, OK. So it looks like comparing to Jetty is my only next step. Although I'm not sure what I'm going to do based on the result of that test -- if Jetty behaves differently, then I still don't know why the heck Tomcat is behaving badly! :) Michael
