> My problem is that Fernando is being told to defend the existing RFC.
And who told him to do that ? Some one who recommended him to grep for "insertion" string in the text without understanding the full sentences where such world may exist ? Hmmm why would anyone do that ? By that notion it would be much more productive to simply talk to tools team and update draft submission parser. When in any document "IPv6" and "insertion" strings occur even once - REJECT. It would save so many emails ..... And Fernando is doing great job btw - but there is just little problem - no one is attacking any existing RFC. > It is up to the SRv6 proposers to argue and defend the changes they want. > Consensus has to be reached to make a change, not to keep the current > consensus. > And that is precisely what is happening. The draft quoted mail earlier is a real prove of that. Now let's relax and enjoy the weekend :-) Cheers, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
