Hi Robert, > All SRv6 existing specs can progress just fine with that last mode of > insertion being removed if rough consensus in 6man would not get reached.
My problem is that Fernando is being told to defend the existing RFC. That is wrong. It is up to the SRv6 proposers to argue and defend the changes they want. Consensus has to be reached to make a change, not to keep the current consensus. Cheers, Sander _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
