Ole,
I am not quite sure how to take this email. Are you suggesting that we should
review less, post less, and let the rubber stamping begin?
Since you have named me, personally, are you suggesting that my contributions
have been less than helpful.
Ron
(fairly upset)
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: otr...@employees.org <otr...@employees.org>
Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 2:42 PM
To: Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>; Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>;
SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; 6man <6...@ietf.org>; int-...@ietf.org; Bob Hinden
<bob.hin...@gmail.com>; rtg-ads <rtg-...@tools.ietf.org>; Fernando Gont
<fg...@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network
Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
> While I may agree with you that is an attack on process here – and you may
> even find consensus on that statement – I am far from convinced you would
> find consensus on the question of which group is conducting the attack on
> process.
From
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/?qdr=m&so=frm__;!8WoA6RjC81c!S6FKrq2Xdn2_T2g0140QWYsg_JFo3VitTbn1Jsdnz7Hvh5mRgNDATSSm3OJBQ82k$
The last month's 10 top posters are:
Fernando: 25
Ole: 17 (including this message :-))
Bob: 12
Brian: 11
Ron: 10
Tom: 9
Gyan: 8
Sander: 8
Andrew: 7
Enno: 6
Ole
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
