Just wrote a letter today to an architect who's asking our expertise and then ignoring it. Typical situation, the U certificate we got showed the UG was installed to YES standard, and somehow they flushed when the city tap wasn't done yet. Architect argued the water co was ok with a 150 psi test. We just wrote that they could accept anything they want, but if our system fails in a fire you will see our counsel introduce this letter as evidence that we believe the flushing and testing was improper and we should be held harmless, cc to my atty, have a nice day- we start from floor flange.
Hopefully we'll never need it, but if we do, it will be P R I C E L E S S. Glc Oh, if I only had a nickel for every blank U certificate we've given a site guy.... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Kingston Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: What does not fully functional mean? We often have difficulty getting the underground velocity flush certificate on projects and that results in completed systems remaining off. Kurt Kingston Commercial Fire Protection Inc. _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
