This is true, a firewatch should suffice but in either case it is action that has to be taken by the owner that otherwise would not so hopefully the sum of all of the comments will deter him from doing this. Thanks to all for the help.
Rod -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: impairment procedures You would be one tough AHJ. I don't believe he would be required to shut down but would have to implement an impairment procedure, part of which is a manned fire watch 24/7. I am sure there are some occupancies that would entail shutting down the operation, for instance high hazard occupancies, high occupant facilities (aka The Station), etc. I'll let our AHJ friends chime in on the specifics. Roland On Jul 11, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Ken Holsopple wrote: > Rod, > > One other thing that might be useful is asking the owner if he is > willing to shut his hotel down if the pool requires maintenance and > the pool has to be drained. > > > Best Regards, > Ken Holsopple > Design Manager > Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc. > 570-837-7647 > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject > field) > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
