Did the second test point plot out along the original water supply curve?

Craig Rauch
Washington Twp. Fire Department

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Pinigis
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

I just re-read your original question.  If I read it correctly, you indicate 
that your demand point is below the curve, but the flow measured during the 
test was less than the demand flow of your system.

As long as you are below the curve you are fine.  The amount of flow at the 
time of the test is irrelevant, it simply provides a point on your curve.

Paul J. Pinigis, P.E.
Chief Life Safety Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Burtell
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

I have tried a new flow test with two 2-1/2" openings flowing and the pressure 
dropped off so that didn't work. I checked the coefficient and it is a .9. The 
hydrant does have a rounded inlet. I don't have play pipes and either does the 
city which is the only one that can do the test. I have tried different heads 
and pipes and nothing will drop my GPM to below the 31 gpm we are short.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

That was my first thought too.  Joe's been around and must have already done 
this.  Maybe he's having a bad day or there is more to the story.

To answer Joe's question plainly, no.  The but is I never meet an AHJ that 
wouldn't give up 31gpm especially on a 500 hose allowance.  A fire pump is a 
tough sell for 31 gpm especially when the hose isn't used until the FD arrives 
and they bring a pump.  I'd though, if as an AHJ, would make sure you really 
did practically max out pipe sizes.

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.

763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390

Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Carr
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

If you plot it out on a curve you will have more than 1210 but at a lower 
residual pressure.

Richard Carr, SET
Design Manager
Associated Sprinkler Co., LLC
336.373.3901 ext 217
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Burtell
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:58 AM
To: SprinklerFORUM
Subject: Water Supply

I have a project where the system demand with hose allowance exceeds the city 
supply by 31 GPM. It's still under the curve but the city flow test was 1210 
and my system demand is 1241. Is there anything in the codes that allows me to 
exceed the city capscity?

Best regards,

Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS
Burtell Fire Protection, Inc.
Phone: 406.652.7697
Fax: 406.652.7743
Cell: 406.861.4507

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to