Hello Roland, I had the guys get 10 bags of feathers when they were at the hen house today....
Friday, September 19, 2008, 3:09:02 PM, you wrote: > I have also challenged using 40 gal as the trigger point. The > substantiation said that value was piked because it was where special > calculation were required (remember this was for changing the 07 where > there were NO other calculations thus that was BS). The old 40 gal > was a trigger for ECONOMICAL considerations between AF and dry pipe > which was no longer valid so deleted. We need to see at what point it > takes too long before the AF is discharged and we are getting just > water out in making the decision on what size requires the DW. 40 gal > is just too bloody small. > We shall see. Any one smell tar in the air? > Roland > On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Travis Mack, SET wrote: >> >> I think that I will just use this diagram in the future until there >> is more >> clarification on the issue from NFPA 13 officials. This will really >> impact >> those of you in the northern part of the country with respect to AF >> systems40 gallons. The viscosities get way out of hand real quick at >> those lower >> temps. > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) -- Best regards, Charles Thurston mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coastal Fire Protection _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
