The comment below stating the flow switch activation does not need to be
timed for wet systems because "the water is already there" is absolutely
true THEORETICALLY. The "real life" truth is that all wet systems which
benefit from electronic fire alarms should be timed to ensure they will
operate with 90 seconds as required by NFPA and the Life Safety Code.
Anyone who has conducted inspections knows the flow switch does not activate
the very instance the ITC is opened. If the sprinkler system was 100% full
of water, this would be the case; however, nearly all sprinkler systems have
some trapped air pockets. Real life problems exist when the trapped air
pockets are relatively large. A real life problem is when the delay on the
flow switch is set for 30 seconds (the switch activates at 30 seconds during
functional testing) and the electronic fire alarm does not activate when the
ITC is wide open for 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes or longer. This
happens when the trapped air pocket allows (causes) the flow switch to cycle
repeatedly! 

 

Rodney K. Hamm, P.E.
President/Owner
Falcon Fire Protection
Office  (478) 953-1677

Cell  (478) 396-6988

 

Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:30:43 -0700

From: Ron Greenman <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Test/Drain at the Riser

To: [email protected]

Message-ID:

      <[email protected]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 

Timothy,

 

You're right about testing the single head flow but on a wet system

this can be done from anywhere since the water is equal everywhere. It

does not need to be timed at the most remote point because it is

already there. Timing is in this case to note the time from beginning

of flow to alarm. This of course is only accurate if the test line is

equipped with an orifice plate of the same K factor as the smallest

head orifice. This I know Steve knows so the presumption would be that

he was describing this as part of his overall scheme.

 

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Timothy W Goins <[email protected]> wrote:

> I respectfully disagree.

> 

> The purpose is to test the alarm device during a one head fire flow. Since

> we have to time the device, putting it at the most remote area makes more

> since, since we are simulating a fire at the most remote area and timing
the

> activation of the alarm device. The alarm device must activate before 90

> seconds (Electric) and or 5 minutes (Water Motor Alarm) you pick.

> 

> If you are ONLY checking that the alarm device will work at the riser okay

> then, but I don't believe that that is the intent of the ITC.

> 

> Just my opinion,

> 

> Timothy Goins

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to