Granted it all depends on how many heads you're talking about.  That is 
something we don't know.  If there are several booths with exhaust and you're 
coming off a municipal main, then give it a whirl and see what happens.  Saving 
3-4 gpm per head may be significant.  But if it's a single booth and we're 
talking 2-3 heads you probably won't see enough difference in flow and 
pressures to amount to much if anything.  It all depends on the magnitude of 
the scope of work involved.    

Agreed on the orifice statement, I've been in deluge mode all morning.  
Thinking about open nozzles.  Sorry for any confusion.


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Mixing k-factors in paintspray booths

I beg to differ my friend.  SOMETIMES it's not worth the effort but SOMETIMES 
it is.  Perhaps it's no big deal in a large industrial site with multiple fire 
pumps.  Which I think is your typical business.  When dealing with 50 psi 
statics shaving a few gpm here and there saves a lot of fire pumps where they 
are otherwise not needed.  OK maybe not a lot but certainly some.  That's some 
big $$$$ saving with the difference of not throwing away water using smaller 
k's.  Then there is main size saving potentially.  A little balancing as 
allowed can cut 100 gpm off the flows in situations like these.  Might even be 
the difference in a tank size or an extra tank when dealing with multiples.  50 
psi would be more typical in these parts of the country.

So throw in a sometimes and I'll go along with most of what you said.
Except the clogging part.  It's the RTI and linkage moving out of the way that 
would be the problem with paint build up.  I don't see orifice size
being a factor here.    


Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Mixing k-factors in paintspray booths

If you're trying to save a few gpm by going with the smaller orifice, it's 
really not worth the effort.  Plus unless you're bagging the heads, smaller 
orifice is more likely to get clogged sooner than larger orifice from the 
spraying effort.  In addition, depending on the hazard you're protecting, a 
little cushion on the discharge side may not be a bad thing.  No need to shave 
the hydraulics that close.  When heads get covered and need to be replaced, the 
smaller orifice probably won't be noticed and the head will be
replaced with a standard 5.6 anyway.  Keep it simple.   

What is the key material being sprayed?


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy Knutson
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mixing k-factors in paintspray booths

Forum Members,

 

Can I use a smaller k-factor sprinkler in the pit and exhaust plenum of a paint 
spray booth?

Due to the geometry of the pit and exhaust plenum. The sprinklers in there are 
covering about 36 square feet per sprinkler.

Any insight would be appreciated.

 

Randy Knutson

Shilo Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to