As part of this theoretical letter writing process, did your attorney tell
you to copy the AHJ?

Bill Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles
Thurston
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:31 PM
To: Todd Williams
Subject: Re: Hydraulic Calcs

Hello Todd,

After my lawyer wrote a very carefully worded letter to the owner with a
copy to the AHJ.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 3:15:17 PM, you wrote:

> I walked into a 100 year old building with the original system and 
> they were storing 10 ft high palletized empty PVC toothpaste tubes. 
> The FM had been through the building and had said nothing. If the 
> contract was to replace old with new, would you do it?


> At 02:51 PM 1/12/2011, you wrote:
>>That would be a change of occupancy and so require a new analysis.
>>Different issue. Nothing changes, only replacing the system exactly as
>>it was and it's a repair unless someone like Rich (AHJ) wants to call
>>it otherwise

>>On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > If a system is installed that is an exact duplicate of an existing
system,
>> > which it is to replace, is that considered a new system under the Code
or a
>> > "repair" of a system under 25? Where is the cut-off between the two?
How
>> > would any of the AHJ's out there address this?
>> >
>> > Now George, supposed your building has 12ft storage of expanded
plastics or
>> > flammable liquid storage? Most likely the pipe schedule system is not
going
>> > to be able to protect those occupancies. Would you swap the system old
for
>> > new as it was installed? How would the attorney for the plaintiff react
to
>> > that?
>> >
>> > I didn't even bring up the issues about 3/4", 3-1/2" and 5" pipe.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > At 12:33 PM 1/12/2011, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So you run new UG into a building that was legally pipe schedule
because
>> >> the calc (that wasn't required under the valid but old design
criteria)
>> >> doesn't work? It doesn't have to, its designed to the applicable code
at
>> >> installation.
>> >>
>> >> George Church'
>> >> Rowe Sprinkler
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> 570-837-7647
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [email protected]
>> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> Todd Williams
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:20 PM
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> Subject: Re: Hydraulic Calcs
>> >>
>> >> Ok, so in Doug's situation, it constitutes a new installation and not
>> >> repair work (based on your first statement) and it is based on a prior
>> >> design. However, as a new installation wouldn't the design need to
meet
>> >> current Codes irregardless of when the design was done and 
>> probably require
>> >> hydraulic calculations?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Todd G. Williams, PE
>> > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>> > Stonington, CT
>> > 860.535.2080
>> > www.fpdc.com
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> >
>> > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>> >
>> > To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
>> > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> >



>>--
>>Ron Greenman
>>Instructor
>>Fire Protection Engineering Technology
>>Bates Technical College
>>1101 So. Yakima Ave.
>>Tacoma, WA 98405

>>[email protected]

>>http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

>>253.680.7346
>>253.576.9700 (cell)

>>Member:
>>AFSA, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, NFSA, AFAA, ASEE, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC

>>They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
>>Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

>>For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

>>To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

> Todd G. Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860.535.2080
> www.fpdc.com

> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



-- 
Best regards,
 Charles Thurston                            mailto:[email protected]
  Coastal Fire Protection/ Myrtle Beach Fire & Safety Group.
   AFAA Guest

Electronic Privacy Notice:
This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may  
be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also  
confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended  
recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from  
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this  
information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that  
you have received this communication in error, and then immediately  
delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to