Let me add more fuel to this discussion. 13D allows omitting the sprinklers from the garages...regardless of size...and regardless of whether or not additional living space is built above the garage. Here in Texas, they built everything bigger...houses with 4 to 10 car garages...and 2 or 3-story houses with living areas above the garages...and 13D doesn't require sprinklers in these garages. Several jurisdictions in the area already require sprinklers in the garages whenever there are living space above.
Anyone wish to comment? rick matsuda city of dallas -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Residential Garages, 13R & me. The repeat what John alluded to: 13D is focused solely on life safety (although property protection typically comes along for the ride for MOST fires) as portrayed by the 10 minutes supply. 13R intends a longer duration of life safety and a small bump in property protection with the 30 minute supply and larger design area. IN looking at section 1.2.1 - Purpose for both documents, the term property protection is not in 13D but is in 13R. Roland Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Vince Sabolik <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of sounding even more stupid than I feel, why would > 13D allow ommission of garage heads and 13R not? > > Same situation, the garage is under a room (above) in 13D -or- in 13R, > just an extra story. > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
