I believe you are not understanding my explanation, maybe because my
explanation was poorly done - try this:

Lets say you have a backflow in a pit or heated enclosure directly after
the property line with an FDC on the discharge side of the backflow (system
side) and then underground piping to the building feeding a system riser.
The fire marshal says you cannot do this because you will be pressurizing
the underground supply; you have to come off the interior piping and pipe
back out to the free standing FDC; which in turn may be or may not be
required to be right next to your pit.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Smith, Steven D. (CSFD) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> And sometimes "government employees" have to educate less than
> knowledgably contractors.  ;)
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Forest Wilson
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:02 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: FDC Arrangement
>
> What is there to document?
> He doesn't understand the Standard;
> A fine example of a government employee telling a knowledgeable contractor
> what to do.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Bobby Gillett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > We have a project that requires a Free Standing FDC. Typically we
> > would use the scenario of putting the backflow preventer above ground
> > and mounting the FDC on the dishcarge side of the backflow before
> > going back underground  to supply the system in the building. The
> > local fire marshall is wanting the FDC to come off the interior system
> > and pipe underground back out to the FDC; he is quoting the
> > explanation after 912.1 of the 2012
> > IFC: "These connections give the fire department the capability of
> > supplying the necessary water to the automatic sprinkler system at a
> > sufficient pressure *without pressurizing the underground supply*."
> > I believe this is being misinterpreted - my interpretation is that
> > this is referencing *not pressurizing the underground supply* on the
> > supply side of the backflow (or a check valve depending on the
> > scenario) - not the underground to the system on the discharge side of
> the backflow.
> >
> > Has anyone dealt with this scenario yet and is their documentation out
> > there straightening this out?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Bobby Gillett
> > Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
> > (850) 937-1850
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to