In light & ordinary hazards it's usually not a big deal as long as you've
accounted for elevation differences. 400 gpm flowing through a thousand
feet of 8" DIP equates to a little over 1 psi friction loss.


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Brian - I suspect he is misguided (or he misunderstands) based on
> confusing the rules for looped city mains with mains that are dead end. As
> a general rule, if your test was taken off looped mains, then you wouldn't
> have to take the calcs back to the gauge hydrant because the supply flow
> comes from different directions.  I can easily see someone taking that as
> an absolute rule - especially if they only design systems off well looped
> mains in the middle of cities.
>
> Yet another reason why third party engineers supposedly responsible for
> sprinkler specs should be the ones either conducting, overseeing, or at
> least approving the hydrant flow test for a project (assuming they are
> competent, of course, which really IS supposed to be the baseline
> assumption...).  It can be difficult to bid and win a project supplied off
> a dead-end main when your competition is under the assumption that they can
> take that flow test from 1,000 ft. upstream and apply it to the point of
> connection to the main.
>
> Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection
> Engineer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 |
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 8:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Location of Flow Test in Calc's
>
> Was just told by one of our new designers that he was taught that it
> didn't matter where the flow test was taken on the underground that you
> just need to take it back to the tie in point at the main & that everywhere
> he's worked does it that way. News to me, any of you guys do it that way?
> If so how do you account for the loss in the underground to the test
> hydrant, elevation, etc.... ?
>
> Brian Harris, CET
> BVS Systems Inc.
> Sprinkler Division
> bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/>
> Phone: 704.896.9989
> Fax: 704.896.1935
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to