Mark and Geoff,

I agree that this in no way chalks up to the equivalent of a fire rated wall. 
(I am still under the impression that the only window sprinklers and the 
associated glass construction requirements are the only assembly out there that 
would be equivalent. It's been awhile since I have to deal with this.) But the 
mention of the smoke partition and the addition of "without Obstruction" makes 
me think in a different direction. 

The "without obstruction" means to me.....don't put a duct or soffit between 
the required closely spaced sprinklers and the glass. That is just my 
interpretation only. It is a prescribed alternative to a rated wall.

Without wanting to stray from what Greg originally ask asked, there is code 
basis for the request made of him from the design professional. The code is 
saying you can do this. I can't speak to the thought process behind allowing 
the alternative or what it will achieve. Maybe the glass is such a common 
feature that the authors thought it warranted an alternative, but didn't want 
to require the more expensive glass and window sprinkler configuration. I can't 
follow what may be implied, but I understand the concerns raised.

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if this is still permitted in the newer 
additions of the IBC?

Best Regards,
Ken Holsopple

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark A. Sornsin, P.E.
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Atrium

I agree with Geoff. The problem remains the total wetting of the glass. This 
cannot be achieved with the horizontal mullions in  place. Moreover, can 
"entire surface of the glass" be wetted using standard sprinklers in a water 
curtain arrangement as opposed to listed window sprinklers?

Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection Engineer | 
Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
http://www.kfiengineers.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ken Holsopple
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Atrium

Roland,

I don't disagree but.....

If Section 404.6  (see below) of the IBC prescribes the closely spaced 
sprinklers and the architect choses that instead of the other options listed to 
protect the atrium, then is it that big of a jump to apply Sections 8.15.4 and 
11.3.3 out of NFPA 13? (2007 edition.)

I only ask because the commentary in the 2007 handbook seems to allude that the 
requirement to provide the curtains is driven by the building code(s) and the 
NFPA 13 gives the how to.

404.6 Enclosure of atriums. Atrium spaces shall be separated from adjacent 
spaces by a I-hour fire barrier constructed in accordance with Section 707 or a 
horizontal assembly constructed in accordance with Section 712, or both.

Exceptions:
   1. A glass wall forming a smoke partition where automatic sprinklers are 
spaced 6 feet (1829 mm) or less along both sides of the separation wall, or on 
the room side only if there is not a walkway on the atrium side, and between 4 
inches and 12 inches (102 mm and 305
mm) away from the glass and designed so that the entire surface of the glass is 
wet upon activation of the sprinkler system without obstruction. The glass 
shall be installed in a gasketed frame so that the framing system deflects 
without breaking (loading) the glass before the sprinkler system operates.

    2. A glass-block wall assembly in accordance with Section
2110 and having a 3/4-hour fire protection rating.

     3. The adjacent spaces of any three floors of the atrium shall not be 
required to be separated from the atrium where such spaces are accounted for in 
the design of the smoke control system.

Funny how the IBC doesn't mention how many sprinklers are required to be 
calculated. Is a calc even necessary or is it implied that you go to NFPA 13 
for that?

Best Regards,
Ken Holsopple


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to