How about stems at 7-10 Ron?

p.s. I'm working on an X-word puzzle... 6 letters starts with d ends with
e... a little help?
p.s.s. you were right a couple years ago when you told me if I'm looking
for a little love I might be looking in the wrong place.
I wish I was Larry, or Steve L right about now.
On Apr 28, 2016 5:14 PM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:

> I hate to state the obvious, nor sound like a d....e, but it's because it
> os the rule. It's the same if I have a duct that is 48" wide I need to
> place sprinklers under the duct but i can have multiple ducts 47" wide with
> a gap 1" wide between them, and I can have then all across the room and
> don't have to sprinkler under them. So at some point you have to look at
> common practice and you'd never see my scenario. What about yours? Do you
> regularly run into 2' 11" and 3' 1" stems?
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Larry Keeping <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It may be of help if you reference the 2016 edition of NFPA 13.
> >
> > There, in Section 8.6.4.1.2(5) the 3 ft limit has been deleted.
> >
> > The Committee Statement for that revision was that concrete tees are
> > capable of withstanding the heat long enough for sprinklers to activate
> > even when the tees are closer than 3 feet on centers.
> >
> > Larry Keeping
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > [email protected]
> > Sent: April-28-16 5:35 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: NFPA 13 (2013) 8.6.4.1.2(5) - why the 3ft minimum?
> >
> > Forum,
> >
> > We have concrete tee construction.  Bottom of stems measured from the
> > ceiling is 26" down.  Centerline of stems are spaced apart in an every
> > other fashion of 7', 2'8", 7', 2'8", etc.  Ideally we would like to use
> > NFPA 13 (2013) 8.6.4.1.2(5) to protect the area so we don't have to add
> > additional sprinklers/piping.  However it states this is only applicable
> > for 3ft to 7.5ft stem spacing.  Can someone tell me the purpose behind
> the
> > 3ft minimum threshold?  Even though we have some 2'8" sections, do you
> > believe the intent of this code was for my situation?  Or do you believe
> > the intent is for concrete tee construction where every stem is 3ft or
> > less?  I can see people interpreting this passage either way as all stems
> > are spaced away from another stem more than 3ft, yet all stems are spaced
> > away from another stem less than 3ft.
> >
> > To me, it seems ridiculous that I can have stems with any depth (let's
> say
> > 10ft)  and spaced 3'1" apart and the deflector can be located 1" below
> the
> > bottom of the stem (10'1") and branchlines can be spaced 15ft apart.  Yet
> > if the same depth stems are spaced 2'11" apart the deflector can't be
> lower
> > than 22" below the ceiling and because they are now obstructed, they have
> > to be in every pocket.
> >
> > I appreciate anyone's opinion on my situation and/or knowledge/history of
> > this codes development.
> >
> > Note: As I allude to, I know there are other ways to design this system
> > utilizing 22" and beam rule.  I am more looking for the "Why's" or the
> "You
> > missed this blurb" that agrees with your stance .
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sean VG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ron Greenman
>
> 4110 Olson Dr., NW
> Gig Harbor, WA 98335
>
> [email protected]
>
> 253.576.9700
>
> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
> inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to