Ok, lol, thanks. And a correction, you would need the Absolute Roughness of SS to do a Darcy. Mistakes like that is not the reason Bradley drinks, he drinks because he likes the buzz :) On Aug 1, 2016 5:35 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have an over-zealous plans reviewer worried about the in-building riser > sweep we use to transition from UG to OH. We’ve spent 2 man-hours to > account for a .03 PSI pressure differential. But righteousness has > prevailed and we can add a node and document the sweep now, so our plans > reviewer should be able to sleep for the rest of the week. I’m > embarrassed at our sloppiness, using 140 for 10 critical feet of pipe and > whatnot. > > > > This is why Chapter 17 of my great novel is tentatively titled “Why Stevie > Drinks”. > > > > SML > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brad > Casterline > *Sent:* Monday, August 01, 2016 3:26 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: C-factor for stainless steel > > > > Just curious about the application Steve, if it's not too proprietary? > I was going to guess foam concentrate piping but I think that requires > Darcy instead of Hazen whereby you would need the friction factor instead > of the c-factor... > So, uhhh???? > > Brad > > On Aug 1, 2016 5:05 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Don't feel bad, I went through the exact same exercise last October. LOL. > Right there the whole time but read over it a half dozen times until > someone on this form was kind enough to point it out to me. > > > > > > BK > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Mark Phillips" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Subject: C-factor for stainless steel > Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2016 3:51 PM > > > > It's a Monday for sure for me > > > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid > > On Aug 1, 2016 5:49 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, no sh#t. Next to copper, blipped right over it. > > > > SML > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Bob > > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 1:38 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: C-factor for stainless steel > > > > NFPA 13, 2013 ed. Table 23.4.4.7.1, C Value 150. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Bob Knight, CET III > > 208-318-3057 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Steve Leyton > > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 2:10 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: C-factor for stainless steel > > > > Does anyone know the C-factor of stainless steel and/or have a reference to a > materials standard that substantiates that value? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve L. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
