Ha! I'm going to get people to flush all the toilets at the same time and destroy your precision. 3/100th of a pound in a calculation based on a fairy tale developed from a bouncing gauge with an allowable degree of accuracy plus/minus 3%. I see Scan giving a lecture on calculations, right elbow in his left had while the forearm and right hand describe an arch of 25 or so degrees, representing the gauge during a pitot test.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, lol, thanks. > And a correction, you would need the Absolute Roughness of SS to do a > Darcy. > Mistakes like that is not the reason Bradley drinks, he drinks because he > likes the buzz > :) > On Aug 1, 2016 5:35 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We have an over-zealous plans reviewer worried about the in-building >> riser sweep we use to transition from UG to OH. We’ve spent 2 man-hours >> to account for a .03 PSI pressure differential. But righteousness has >> prevailed and we can add a node and document the sweep now, so our plans >> reviewer should be able to sleep for the rest of the week. I’m >> embarrassed at our sloppiness, using 140 for 10 critical feet of pipe and >> whatnot. >> >> >> >> This is why Chapter 17 of my great novel is tentatively titled “Why >> Stevie Drinks”. >> >> >> >> SML >> >> >> >> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brad >> Casterline >> *Sent:* Monday, August 01, 2016 3:26 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: C-factor for stainless steel >> >> >> >> Just curious about the application Steve, if it's not too proprietary? >> I was going to guess foam concentrate piping but I think that requires >> Darcy instead of Hazen whereby you would need the friction factor instead >> of the c-factor... >> So, uhhh???? >> >> Brad >> >> On Aug 1, 2016 5:05 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Don't feel bad, I went through the exact same exercise last October. LOL. >> Right there the whole time but read over it a half dozen times until >> someone on this form was kind enough to point it out to me. >> >> >> >> >> >> BK >> >> >> >> ----- Reply message ----- >> From: "Mark Phillips" <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" < >> [email protected]> >> Subject: C-factor for stainless steel >> Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2016 3:51 PM >> >> >> >> It's a Monday for sure for me >> >> >> >> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid >> >> On Aug 1, 2016 5:49 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Oh, no sh#t. Next to copper, blipped right over it. >> >> >> >> SML >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Bob >> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 1:38 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: RE: C-factor for stainless steel >> >> >> >> NFPA 13, 2013 ed. Table 23.4.4.7.1, C Value 150. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> Bob Knight, CET III >> >> 208-318-3057 >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> On Behalf Of Steve Leyton >> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 2:10 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: C-factor for stainless steel >> >> >> >> Does anyone know the C-factor of stainless steel and/or have a reference to >> a materials standard that substantiates that value? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Steve L. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > -- Ron Greenman 4110 Olson Dr., NW Gig Harbor, WA 98335 [email protected] 253.576.9700 A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering, inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
