Apparently, he didn't understand either Brad.
The question was in response to a previous answer of mine explaining
what was meant by "full height cross section", as this designer didn't
know what the plan reviewer was asking for on the plans which had been
rejected. When I went through the process of explaining exactly what a
"full height cross section" was, I noted for him that it represented a
good location in which to indicate construction type (obstructed or
unobstructed, combustible or non-combustible), roof pitch, concealed
spaces, hanger and bracing locations and connections, and the required
deflector positions relative to the deck and or framing members for the
installers.
His response, word for word: "What does the 'deflector position
relative to deck above' mean? I am confused with that."
After coating the lining of my stomach with Maalox, I gave him what I
thought was a reasonable answer, and thanked the Lord that I had quit
drinking in 2006.
sincerely,
*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, California 92025
*****Phone 760-745-6181*
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> ***
On 08/01/2016 5:25 PM, Brad Casterline wrote:
How did you answer that question Ken? The only thing I know about
deflector distance is minimum and maximum. I don't understand 'required'.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
