How did you answer that question Ken? The only thing I know about deflector distance is minimum and maximum. I don't understand 'required'. On Aug 1, 2016 6:46 PM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ha! I'm going to get people to flush all the toilets at the same time and > destroy your precision. 3/100th of a pound in a calculation based on a > fairy tale developed from a bouncing gauge with an allowable degree of > accuracy plus/minus 3%. I see Scan giving a lecture on calculations, right > elbow in his left had while the forearm and right hand describe an arch of > 25 or so degrees, representing the gauge during a pitot test. > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, lol, thanks. >> And a correction, you would need the Absolute Roughness of SS to do a >> Darcy. >> Mistakes like that is not the reason Bradley drinks, he drinks because he >> likes the buzz >> :) >> On Aug 1, 2016 5:35 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> We have an over-zealous plans reviewer worried about the in-building >>> riser sweep we use to transition from UG to OH. We’ve spent 2 man-hours >>> to account for a .03 PSI pressure differential. But righteousness has >>> prevailed and we can add a node and document the sweep now, so our plans >>> reviewer should be able to sleep for the rest of the week. I’m >>> embarrassed at our sloppiness, using 140 for 10 critical feet of pipe and >>> whatnot. >>> >>> >>> >>> This is why Chapter 17 of my great novel is tentatively titled “Why >>> Stevie Drinks”. >>> >>> >>> >>> SML >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brad >>> Casterline >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 01, 2016 3:26 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: C-factor for stainless steel >>> >>> >>> >>> Just curious about the application Steve, if it's not too proprietary? >>> I was going to guess foam concentrate piping but I think that requires >>> Darcy instead of Hazen whereby you would need the friction factor instead >>> of the c-factor... >>> So, uhhh???? >>> >>> Brad >>> >>> On Aug 1, 2016 5:05 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Don't feel bad, I went through the exact same exercise last October. >>> LOL. Right there the whole time but read over it a half dozen times until >>> someone on this form was kind enough to point it out to me. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> BK >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Reply message ----- >>> From: "Mark Phillips" <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" < >>> [email protected]> >>> Subject: C-factor for stainless steel >>> Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2016 3:51 PM >>> >>> >>> >>> It's a Monday for sure for me >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid >>> >>> On Aug 1, 2016 5:49 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Oh, no sh#t. Next to copper, blipped right over it. >>> >>> >>> >>> SML >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: Sprinklerforum >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob >>> >>> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 1:38 PM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: RE: C-factor for stainless steel >>> >>> >>> >>> NFPA 13, 2013 ed. Table 23.4.4.7.1, C Value 150. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> >>> >>> Bob Knight, CET III >>> >>> 208-318-3057 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >>> On Behalf Of Steve Leyton >>> >>> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 2:10 PM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: C-factor for stainless steel >>> >>> >>> >>> Does anyone know the C-factor of stainless steel and/or have a reference to >>> a materials standard that substantiates that value? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Steve L. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> > > > -- > Ron Greenman > > 4110 Olson Dr., NW > Gig Harbor, WA 98335 > > [email protected] > > 253.576.9700 > > A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering, > inventor and engineer (1876-1958) > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
