I didn't

I was showing if it all is one system as Ron was eluding to, floor controls
not considered as separation, the cumulative total of floor space being
covered under a single riser would be 120K

BUT if floor controls ARE considered as a riser, each RISER is covering 30K.


I never said that 30K is a max per riser but if, under my example, floor
controls are merely considered making the system easier to drain and not a
separate system, then it exceeds 52K as allowed.

Right?

 

Jeff Bridges

JB Fire Protection Inc

(888) 523-4737 Fax (714) 578-0901

Fire Sprinklers Save Lives & Property

 <http://www.jbfireprotection.com/> www.jbfireprotection.com

 

This email transmission (and any of its attachments) is intended only for
the person or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged information. No waiver of any applicable
privileges or protections is intended hereby. If you are not the person to
whom this transmission is addressed, you are hereby notified that the
disclosure, copying, distribution, reliance upon or use of any of the
information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, delete any copies which may exist
on your system and notify the sender immediately. This email transmission
cannot be guaranteed secure or error-free. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
specifies them to be the views of the company and is authorized to do so.

 

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Parsley Consulting
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 11:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 5 year fire sprinkler Obstruction Assessment - What items in a
system define it as a separate wet pipe system?

 

Jeff,
    I'm kind of curious how you've decided that 30,000 square foot per floor
exceeds the allowable floor space per riser.  Aren't the values in 8.2.1
supposed to be applied to any one floor area?  

Ken Wagoner, SET
Parsley Consulting
350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
Escondido, California 92025
Phone 760-745-6181
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> 

On 09/01/2016 10:45 AM, Jeff Bridges wrote:

I would respectfully disagree with the below analogy. 

Example: (4) Story building consisting of 30K SF per floor

Single lead-in supply- combo standpipe with floor controls.

How can it be considered a single system when it exceeds the allowable floor
space per riser?

Just sayin'

 

Jeff Bridges

JBFP Inc

 

 

 

 

I have to disagree with this analysis that a floor control valve defines a
system. A floor control valve is not even defined individually in 2013
whereas a sprinkler system is (no mention of floor control valves) as are
control valves. As always, I would consider a system to be what it has
always been and the addition of the required floor control valve and
associated requirements on systems in multi-story buildings just nationally
codifies a common practice hereabouts of building a system that has
isolatable floors. This way an entire large building does not need to be
drained to make a repair or for a T.I., leaves fore protection in service on
floors not effected and also conserves water.  I'm open to an argument that
changes my mind but this one doesn't.

 






_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to