Both of those figures show “combined” systems as does Figure A.3.3.11.3 (B). As 
the manufacturer that developed the system shown in Figure A.3.3.11.3 (C) I 
will advise that we don’t even sell the Network system anymore and haven’t for 
years. Please don’t confuse the material with the type of system…PEX is an 
alternative material to other piping materials (both metallic and non-metallic) 
and can be used by any qualified installer for multipurpose, passive purge, or 
standalone systems as defined and allowed in NFPA 13D.

Eric Skare
Product Manager, Fire Safety Systems

Eric Skare
Uponor

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of IPA
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 3:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pex

NFPA 13D (2013 ed) Figure A.3.3.11.3 (C) compared to figure A.3.3.11.3.(A) 
should be obvious enough in my opinion.


On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:07 AM, John Irwin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
I need to convince a client that a combined pex system is garbage … and I need 
to do it quickly. Frankly I won’t use it period but other than “it’s crap” is 
there another reason not to use it?


John Irwin
Manager – Fire Sprinkler Division

Critical System Solutions, LLC
2830 Scherer Drive, Suite 300
St. Petersburg, FL  33716
Office: 727.209.5122<tel:727.209.5122>
Fax:      727.209.5126<tel:727.209.5126>
Cell:     813.618.2781<tel:813.618.2781>
Email:  
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[CSS Logo]


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to