Assuming that all system components are correctly designed (including the water 
supply), if a fire pump should burn itself up in the course of a fire event, 
then that's okay.   Pumps are should be considered sacrificial and could be 
just that if an entire water supply is consumed.   

SL

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:24 PM
To: Reza Esmaeili; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Selecting a Fire Pump/ Europeans vs. Americans

Reza,

It sounds like the pump will not be immediately damaged by running with a very 
low back pressure. It is not a good idea to design a pump to run continuously 
at over 140% of its rating - however with a fire control system, if the pump 
reaches a point where it is discharging that amount of water, then  you are 
already outside of the design conditions. 

It is likely that the pump will continue running. Even if the pump does require 
servicing due to cavitation damage or damage to the motor - the main concern 
will be the damage from a fire that was large enough to open that many 
sprinklers.

Of course you can always change your design to handle a wider range of 
conditions. The NFPA code is designed to provide a baseline of safety. You can 
exceed the code minimums. It just requires more time and money.

Matt 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Reza Esmaeili
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 4:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Selecting a Fire Pump/ Europeans vs. Americans

Brad,
Thanks for your comment. It's not about water tank storage. It's about 
considering the maximum flow at the area closet to the pump just in order to 
select the right pump. Check this figure in VdS CEA 4001 Standard:

http://www.sarian.ir/Pump-Curve.png

 Best,
 Reza Esmaeili
  
 Email:[email protected]
 Cell: +98 912 2444875
 Web: www.sarian.ir

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 1/31/17, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: RE: Selecting a Fire Pump/ Europeans vs. Americans
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2017, 1:03 AM
 
 Isn't
 the requirement for calculating the area closest to the pump  only when the 
water supply is water storage tank, to verify  the tank capacity against flow 
rate and duration?
 
 You are right though - American codes do not require the two
 sets-- we calc 'most remote' and use that size all  the way back because the 
closer you get to the riser the  more you will be flowing, hence the concern 
about tank  capacity.
 
 It is a can of worms that has not yet been opened here in  'the states'.
 Brad
 A 1000
 GPM rated pump will not likely produce a flow rate of 1800  GPM. It will limit 
out most likely around 1650 to maybe 1700  GPM. It should then, nonetheless 
provide the minimum design  density at the lest demanding design area. There is 
no code  requirement to produce the maximum flow capacity of a design  area, 
only the minimum.
 
 Mark at Aero
 
 602 820-7894
 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
 
 From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-  [email protected]. 
org] On Behalf Of Reza  Esmaeili
 
 Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 1:56 PM
 
 To: sprinklerforum@lists.
 firesprinkler.org
 
 Subject: Selecting a Fire Pump/ Europeans vs. Americans
 
 
 
  I am glad to write in this nice forum again!
 
 
 
 I don’t understand NFPA 20 for selecting fire pump:
 “Maximum system demand flow should be between 90% and 140%  of pump’s rated 
capacity, but, in no case, greater than  150% of the pump’s rated capacity”.
 
 
 
 That is to say if my total sprinkler and hose demand is  1400GPM, I can simply 
choose a 1000GPM rated pump. 1400GPM  is calculated based on the most remote 
sprinklers, so what  if the sprinklers nearer to pumps are activated and my  
demand jump to 1800GPM? Then at high flow, there is a  possibility for 
cavitation and overloading the motor. Am I  wrong?
 
 
 
 Europeans calculate differently. They calculate the demand  both at the most 
unfavourable area (most remote area) and  most favourable area (near the pump). 
For example if they  calculate 1400GPM at most unfavourable and 1800GPM at most 
 favourable area, then based on these figures they choose a  pump. They also 
check 1800GPM on the pump curve to be sure  it’s less than 140% of rated 
capacity and also less than  16m NPSHr.
 
 
 
 VdS CEA 4001 Standard in Europe: The pump set shall be  capable of providing 
at least the flow and pressure of both  the most favourable and the most 
unfavourable areas. The  maximum flow demand (Qmax) for supplying the most 
favourable  area may exceed the permitted rate by up to 40 %. The  pressure 
shall not fall by more than 30 % (of the pressure  prevailing with the 
permitted rate). The flow demand for the  most unfavourable area shall fall 
below the permitted rate  at all times.
 
 
 
 NFPA 20 and VdS are somehow the same. They limit the maximum  flow demand up 
to 140% of rated capacity, but Europeans  really calculate the minimum and 
maximum demand and check  this is less than 140% but American don’t check 
anything.
 So if like the above example an American designer make a  tight selection 
(Choosing a 1000GPM pump for 1400GPM  demand), is there any possible problem if 
the sprinklers  near the pumps are activated and the pump runs at  1800GPM?
 
 
 
 Best,
 
 
 
 Reza Esmaeili
 
 
 
 Email:[email protected]
 
 Cell: +98 912 2444875
 
 Web: www.sarian.ir
 
 ______________________________ _________________
 
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 
 Sprinklerforum@lists.
 firesprinkler.org
 
 http://lists.firesprinkler.
 org/listinfo.cgi/ sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. org
 
 ______________________________ _________________
 
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 
 Sprinklerforum@lists.
 firesprinkler.org
 
 http://lists.firesprinkler.
 org/listinfo.cgi/ sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. org
 
 
 -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
 
 _______________________________________________
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to