On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:02 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2008 12:20 PM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> This is a bugfix release and is recommended for all users who are >> currently on 0.4.2 or 0.4.2a. > > You really should bump the version number after a version has been > released. 'a' and 'b' look like alpha and beta. > > I installed 0.4.2 this morning, and afterward "easy_install -U > SQLAlchemy" says I already have the latest version. I had to install > it specifically: "easy_install SQLAlchemy==0.4.2b". > that sort of sucks, i thought easy install could recognize lettered revsions. I cant see myself calling these 0.4.3 and 0.4.4 since a point release at that level for us usually means a lot more changes and time spent in SVN. i usually use "alpha" and "beta" to indicate such ive never thought of "a" and "b" that way. of course if we moved to whole numbers, that could help. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
