On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 15:03, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> um yeah, actually this behavior is affecting all multi-level usage of
> "polymorphic_union".   So, while polymorphic_union is quite obviously
> (since nobody has noticed this pretty glaring issue) on the decline in
> the 0.5 series, this is quite severe and ill try to have a look at it
> today.

Do you want a bug report for this?

-- 
Gaƫtan de Menten
http://openhex.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to