On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 15:03, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> um yeah, actually this behavior is affecting all multi-level usage of > "polymorphic_union". So, while polymorphic_union is quite obviously > (since nobody has noticed this pretty glaring issue) on the decline in > the 0.5 series, this is quite severe and ill try to have a look at it > today. Do you want a bug report for this? -- Gaƫtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---