On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 16:04, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this ones big, i can handle it. the attached patch makes your case > work, but the problem represented here still makes itself apparent in > other ways and I havent strength tested this patch. you might want > to see if this patch works in all of your test cases. FWIW, my (only) "more complete" test involving polymorphic concrete inheritance passes too (and produces correct SQL). Your patch seem fine and doesn't seem to break unrelated tests. Thanks for the quick reaction time, as usual. -- Gaëtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
