Thank you everyone who took the time to comment on my Windows DLL question. I'm also glad I'm not the only one who sees the problem with not having the version in the resource block. This really would have helped when Chrome and Firefox updated to a new version of SQLite and all my code stopped working.
I have considered just finding the code I need, stripping it out and compiling it as a static part of my code. That's a great suggestion but as I said, my main app is only 400 KB. I'd really like to keep it that way. I pride myself in the size and performance of my app. I suspect I'm one of the few Windows security apps still using plain C and a little assembly code. I do realize and appreciate the public domain source is available. My best option is recompiling the DLL but since the project and make files aren't designed for Visual Studio it will require time that like everyone her I cherish. Creating a new build also requires me to follow an extensive test plan. I do a complete test plan even if I make a simple text change. Having the DLL out in the public being used by thousands beats any test plan. Luckily, SQLite isn't a major part of my app so I guess I'll try this if the consortium doesn't consider our suggestions. Thank you to everyone who participated. Bill Pytlovany _BillP Studios_ (http://www.billp.com/) | This computer protected by WinPatrol | _http://www.winpatrol.com_ (http://www.winpatrol.com/) _ http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/_ (http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/) _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
