Luis Peralta wrote: > Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status > values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too > simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a > command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that it is in > fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram > should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in > the current spec 'executing' means both things.
Is this at the XEP-50 level or the IO-Data level? > I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a > running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action. Agreed. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
