Hello Neil > One of the side-effects of a lack of continuous OS development is the > increasing number of hacks and patches run by people. I found that part of mcp designed to protect chipmem disagreed with STFax John -- STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX" ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
- [stfax] Re: 1.MessagePlus problem, 2.Miami Darron
- [stfax] Re: 1.MessagePlus problem, 2.Miami Frank Aisenbrey
- [stfax] Re: 1.MessagePlus problem, 2.Miami Manfred Hoffmann
- [stfax] Re: 1.MessagePlus problem, 2.Miami Frank Aisenbrey
- [stfax] Massive problems with STFax v4.1 Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Again: Reliability of STFax v4.1 Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of STFax ... Don Ferguson
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Neil Bothwick
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... John Block
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Athanassios Varamogianis
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Wolfgang Hosemann
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Norbert Roth
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Neil Bothwick
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... John Block
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Chris Wiles
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Neil Bothwick
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... John Block
- [stfax] Re: Again: Reliability of ST... Neil Bothwick
