--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are certainly people in the > world who have done this sort of thing already > (Liferay, BasicPortal, etc.) for non-JSR-168 > portlet APIs, so it's clearly feasible, and it's a > pretty good idea. But, from my perspective, this > sort of thing is actually a Struts-based > application, rather than part of the framework > itself.
Thanks for the insight. Now I understand what the role of Struts would be regarding the Portlet API. In this case I have another question to follow. If Struts will hopefully provide a "framework for building Struts-based portlets", how do you find the idea of cultivating interest for open-source programmers to work on a Struts-based portal server under the Jakarta umbrella? As you say, there are already people who have implemented Struts-based non-JSR-168 portal servers such as Liferay and BasicPortal. I think that it would be wonderful if there could be a joint effort to create an open-source Struts-based portal server under Jakarta, as an alternative to JetSpeed. What do you think? Thanks, Mete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
