I tried to use Liferay the other day and they force you to use Orion and get the CVS if you want the code. otherwise all you get is the compiled stuff. We would have to get them to change that but I would be interesting in seeing what could be done to integrate the two projects
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vic Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Struts and Portlets > > > Sounds good to me. > > Mete Kural wrote: > > Hi Vic, > > > > I read your proposal. As you say, I think it would be > > great to provide Struts-based verticals under a portal > > platform. In your proposal you have mentioned that one > > of BasicPortal's goals is to provide a UI that is > > similar to my.netscape.com. I think that Liferay has > > accomplished this and it also has pretty extensive > > personalization and administration features. Please > > surf through the demo at my.liferay.com Log in as the > > administrator so you can check out the administration > > features as well: > > Login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pass: test > > > > Since now I am somewhat involved in both Liferay and > > BasicPortal (although I have not yet contributed a > > single line of code to either of them) I can clearly > > see that there is a common goal in both of these > > projects: providing an open-source "Struts-based" > > portal server. Both projects have their strengths. > > While BasicPortal has a good lightweight persistence > > framework, Liferay has an extensive UI for > > personalization and administration. I suggest that the > > best of both projects can be combined under a brand > > new Jakarta subproject that would aim to provide a > > Struts-based alternative to JetSpeed. What do you > > think? > > > > -Mete > > > > --- Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PortalProposal > > > >>Mete Kural wrote: > >> > >>>--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>>There are certainly people in the > >>>>world who have done this sort of thing already > >>>>(Liferay, BasicPortal, etc.) for non-JSR-168 > >>>>portlet APIs, so it's clearly feasible, and it's a > >>>>pretty good idea. But, from my perspective, this > >>>>sort of thing is actually a Struts-based > >>>>application, rather than part of the framework > >>>>itself. > >>> > >>> > >>>Thanks for the insight. Now I understand what the > >> > >>role > >> > >>>of Struts would be regarding the Portlet API. In > >> > >>this > >> > >>>case I have another question to follow. If Struts > >> > >>will > >> > >>>hopefully provide a "framework for building > >>>Struts-based portlets", how do you find the idea > >> > >>of > >> > >>>cultivating interest for open-source programmers > >> > >>to > >> > >>>work on a Struts-based portal server under the > >> > >>Jakarta > >> > >>>umbrella? As you say, there are already people who > >>>have implemented Struts-based non-JSR-168 portal > >>>servers such as Liferay and BasicPortal. I think > >> > >>that > >> > >>>it would be wonderful if there could be a joint > >> > >>effort > >> > >>>to create an open-source Struts-based portal > >> > >>server > >> > >>>under Jakarta, as an alternative to JetSpeed. What > >> > >>do > >> > >>>you think? > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>>Mete > >> > >> > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
