On 2015-01-19 9:39 PM, Rufus wrote:
Actually, I *do* work in a very large organization...that produces,
tests, and releases software for aircraft avionics. We have processes
and hierarchy for what gets fixed, in what priority, and in accord with
sets of guidelines...same holds for incorporation of improvements based
on user/operator input.
It doesn't matter who gets hot, bothered, or has a strong opinion - in
the end, we all follow a set of rules and no *single* coder gets to
break a set of standards or determine what sort of output there will be
if more people disagree with his particular approach.
There doesn't seem to be any "management" of what happens to SM...it
seems to just get shotgunned. I may have made a rash assumption that
someone was "in charge" of the SM developers...but it certainly didn't
appear so in the dispute that halted my wanting to become more deeply
involved.
Folks, this discussion does not belong in a SeaMonkey support forum.
Please take it somewhere else.
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
Newsgroup moderator
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
