On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote: > My critism is related to the performance and way of development of Freenet. > In both instances, I have given constructive suggestions too, but you deny > that. And even this time, I said changing to UDP might help with the > firewall issue, so it is not like I'm only given critisism without ever > suggesting alternatives. But, after all this time, it becomes a bit > fatiguing since it never amounts to anything and the level of frustration > because of no real progress (on the end-users perspective) augments. So yes, > it is often sarcastic; ignoring it is fine, pulling the plug out of the > account for it ain't.
There are lots of ways to help with the firewalling issue. Some of them may eventually get implemented. However, it's possible that whatever issue that you happen to remark on isn't a priority at the time you remark on it. And some of your suggestions, such as rewriting Fred over I2P, are not supported by ian, me, and the devs in general, and will not be implemented in the foreseeable future. > > I am implying in an ironic way, that if he has trouble believing that it > works better, he should ask you or toad, since you are both being > over-optimistic in regard to how much it has 'improved' almost all of the > time. Did I EVER say that it would work perfectly for newbies? When? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
