That's strange, my config works with NAT-T too, but i never had problems with 
non-natted, natted or any other  network. 

Am 12.04.2011 um 21:46 schrieb "Paul Mather" <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>:

> On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Fuchs, Martin 
>> <martin.fu...@trendchiller.com> wrote:
>> I have IPSec from my iPhone To pfsense here...
>> Have a look at the Forums. It took some Time but now it works...
>> 
>> I found in the forum that it requires pfSense 2.0.  Does that still stand 
>> true?
>> 
>> And do you configure it via pfSense GUI or a manual hack to the racoon 
>> config file?
>> 
>> I don't find a definitive answer on the forum at all, just a bunch of try 
>> this try that and speculation followed by a bunch of "doesn't work for me" 
>> and "works for me, sorta".
>> 
>> The closest I've found is 
>> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,24752.msg130558/topicseen.html#msg130558
>> 
>> Is that the current "state of the art" for iPhone -> pfSense VPN?  It seems 
>> to be in conflict with how I want mobile client settings for my "road 
>> warrior" network VPNs, such as my home office.  Ie, I do not want to have a 
>> virtual address pool for those connections.
> 
> 
> I have used pfSense 2.0 to set up up an IPsec VPN usable from an iPod Touch, 
> which I believe uses the same client as the iPhone and iPad.  I used pretty 
> much the setup from the link you give above.  In my case, my Phase 2 has 
> "Local Network" of type "Network" and the address is that of my pfSense LAN 
> (whereas the forum post uses Local Network Type "None").  (I actually have 
> two Phase 2 entries, the one just described and another that is the same 
> except the address is 10.0.0.0/24, to allow VPN access to that private 
> network reachable from the pfSense LAN.)
> 
> I did all configuration via the pfSense GUI.  The setup routes all traffic 
> for the network behind the pfSense gateway (172.23.23.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/24) 
> over the IPsec VPN; other traffic goes out as per normal.  Split DNS works, 
> and private DNS hostnames are resolved correctly.
> 
> The VPN works fine when NAT-T is in use.  (The same config doesn't work for 
> my office Mac, which is not behind a NAT.)
> 
> I also tried the L2TP server in pfSense 2.0 today with the Mac OS X L2TP VPN 
> client but couldn't even get it to connect. :-(
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
> 
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

Reply via email to