I'm pretty sure that the per order windowing functions aren't doing what you're expecting with the non-axisymmetric beam patterns that mode-matching decoding produces. I've seen people do this weighting before with decoding using pinv (I think there's a recent paper by N. Epain from a 3rd order array built in Craig Jin's lab), so maybe they're getting something different from my results. But, as far as my experience goes these windowing functions should only be used with simple source decoding methods.
Josh On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, <f...@kokkinizita.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:32:27AM -0700, Aaron Heller wrote: > > > Fons... I assume what your doing is making a decoder with shelf gains > > given by Moreau and Daniel and then testing it numerically and not > > getting the expected value of rE. > > Exactly. > > > I have code to do that as well and > > will take a look it it after the AES Convention this weekend. > > Great, thanks, > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > There are three of them, and Alleline. > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- Joshua Atkins Ph.D. Candidate Dept. Electrical Engineering Johns Hopkins University 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20101103/ddc5b478/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
