On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:23:47PM +0000, Stefan Schreiber wrote: > If you use amplitude panning between more than 2 (2D) or 3 (3D/VBAP) > speakers, you could run into some trouble. Including pX-talk between > more than 2 speakers in the horizont. plain... (same phantom source9 > > This might lead to quite messy ITD and ILD problems. > > So I believe it could make a lot of sense to apply amplitude panning > to the exact minimum amount of speakers you would need to produce > some phantom image effect. Which means 2 speakers in the 2D case, 3 > in the 3D case.
This was actually proven wrong long ago, and it is what Ambisonic decoding gets right. It's really similar to what happens if you interpolate between samples using only the two nearest ones. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
